LM Economic Consortium
  • Certified Programs
  • For Employers
  • For Healthcare Providers
Menu
  • About
  •    The Why of the
       LMERC
  •    Who
  •    Advisory Board
  •    Staff
  • Benefits
  •    For Employers
  •    For Healthcare
       Providers
  •    For Individuals
  • Resources
    • Key Papers and Presentations
    • Certified Programs
Consulting Evidence Database Download Database
Home » Evidences » Interventions with Positive Financial Outcomes » Cost-effectiveness of a Population-based Lifestyle Intervention to Promote Healthy Weight and Physical Activity in Non-attenders of Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Cost-effectiveness of a Population-based Lifestyle Intervention to Promote Healthy Weight and Physical Activity in Non-attenders of Cardiac Rehabilitation.

Submitted by admin on Tue, 08/21/2018 - 17:39

Author(s):

Cheng, Q., et al.

Year Published:

2016

Journal:

Heart, Lung & Circulation

Categories:

Interventions with Positive Financial Outcomes , Cardiovascular disease

Link to Abstract Summary:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26669813

Abstract:

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of two home-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) interventions (Healthy Weight (HW) and Physical Activity (PA)) for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD), who had been referred to cardiac rehabilitation (CR) but had not attended. The interventions consisted of pedometer-based telephone coaching sessions on weight, nutrition and physical activity (HW group) or physical activity only (PA group) and were compared to a control group who received information brochures about physical activity. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using data from two randomised controlled trials. One trial compared HW to PA (PANACHE study), and the second compared PA to usual care. A Markov model was developed which used one risk factor, body mass index (BMI) to determine the CVD risk level and mortality. Patient-level data from the trials were used to determine the transitions to CVD states and healthcare related costs. The model was run for separate cohorts of males and females. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were conducted to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: Given a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY, in the long run, both the HW and PA interventions are cost-effective compared with usual care. While the HW intervention is more effective, it also costs more than both the PA intervention and the control group due to higher intervention costs. However, the HW intervention is still cost-effective relative to the PA intervention for both men and women. Sensitivity analysis suggests that the results are robust. CONCLUSION: The results of this paper provide evidence of the long-term cost-effectiveness of home-based CR interventions for patients who are referred to CR but do not attend. Both the HW and PA interventions can be recommended as cost-effective home-based CR programs, especially for people lacking access to hospital services or who are unable to participate in traditional CR programs.

Need the password to download the full database of studies?

Join our mailing list to get access to this as well as other key resources demonstrating the financial benefits of lifestyle medicine and health improvements:

Employers/Professionals Click Here

Healthcare Providers Click Here

Search and Filter

Press crtl for multiple selections
Range Between Start Year and End Year

We can help to reverse the trend, with the savings going right to your bottom line.

The solvency of our nation is at stake.

Benefits Evidence Database Consulting Resources Contact

Lifestyle Medicine Economic Research Council

The LMERC is a special project of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, a 501(c)3 non-profit charitable organization dedicated to advancing the field of lifestyle medicine as the foundation of a transformed and sustainable system of healthcare delivery.

facebook Twitter Contact
LM Economic Consortium
© 2022 American College of Lifestyle Medicine. Site By Fusion Media Marketing