LM Economic Consortium
  • Certified Programs
  • For Employers
  • For Healthcare Providers
Menu
  • About
  •    The Why of the
       LMERC
  •    Who
  •    Advisory Board
  •    Staff
  • Benefits
  •    For Employers
  •    For Healthcare
       Providers
  •    For Individuals
  • Resources
    • Key Papers and Presentations
    • Certified Programs
Consulting Evidence Database Download Database
Home » Evidences » Interventions with Positive Financial Outcomes » Cost savings from a telemedicine model of care in northern Queensland, Australia.

Cost savings from a telemedicine model of care in northern Queensland, Australia.

Submitted by admin on Tue, 08/21/2018 - 17:39

Author(s):

Thaker, D. A., et al.

Year Published:

2013

Journal:

Medical Journal of Australia

Categories:

Interventions with Positive Financial Outcomes , Other conditions

Link to Abstract Summary:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24033216

Link to Full Article Free Online:

https://www.mja.com.au/journal/2013/199/6/cost-savings-telemedicine-model-care-northern-queensland-australia

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost analysis of a telemedicine model for cancer care (teleoncology) in northern Queensland, Australia, compared with the usual model of care from the perspective of the Townsville and other participating hospital and health services. DESIGN: Retrospective cost-savings analysis; and a one-way sensitivity analysis performed to test the robustness of findings in net savings. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Records of all patients managed by means of teleoncology at the Townsville Cancer Centre (TCC) and its six rural satellite centres in northern Queensland, Australia between 1 March 2007 and 30 November 2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Costs for set-up and staffing to manage the service, and savings from avoidance of travel expenses for specialist oncologists, patients and their escorts, and for aeromedical retrievals. RESULTS: There were 605 teleoncology consultations with 147 patients over 56 months, at a total cost of $442 276. The cost for project establishment was $36 000, equipment/maintenance was $143 271, and staff was $261 520. The estimated travel expense avoided was $762 394; this figure included the costs of travel for patients and escorts of $658 760, aeromedical retrievals of $52 400 and travel for specialists of $47 634, as well as an estimate of accommodation costs for a proportion of patients of $3600. This resulted in a net saving of $320 118. Costs would have to increase by 72% to negate the savings. CONCLUSION: The teleoncology model of care at the TCC resulted in net savings, mainly due to avoidance of travel costs. Such savings could be redirected to enhancing rural resources and service capabilities. This teleoncology model is applicable to geographically distant areas requiring lengthy travel.

Need the password to download the full database of studies?

Join our mailing list to get access to this as well as other key resources demonstrating the financial benefits of lifestyle medicine and health improvements:

Employers/Professionals Click Here

Healthcare Providers Click Here

Search and Filter

Press crtl for multiple selections
Range Between Start Year and End Year

We can help to reverse the trend, with the savings going right to your bottom line.

The solvency of our nation is at stake.

Benefits Evidence Database Consulting Resources Contact

Lifestyle Medicine Economic Research Council

The LMERC is a special project of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, a 501(c)3 non-profit charitable organization dedicated to advancing the field of lifestyle medicine as the foundation of a transformed and sustainable system of healthcare delivery.

facebook Twitter Contact
LM Economic Consortium
© 2022 American College of Lifestyle Medicine. Site By Fusion Media Marketing